Published: September 7, 2010
‘Complexity will be the Science of the XXI Century’ S. Hawking
Mr. Hawking’s Grand Design vs. the classic theories of Creation.
I couldn’t help to buy and read the last ‘masterpiece’ of Mr. Hawking, this excellent science-fiction writer who believes in travel in time (so their black holes evaporate to the past, as children would do into their mother’s womb), but not in God. Indeed, an interesting contradiction. Since after all if time travel is possible, there is no problem with the resurrection of the dead. But we know, science-fiction writers are full of contradictions. This is not the theme of their work. What they always try to do is to shock the audience with new tricks.
So now he has this new book, ‘The Grand design’, in which he affirms that God did not create the Universe and philosophy is dead. So what or who created the Universe? Mr. Hawking has the available answer of course: Man, notoriously Edward Witten and Hawking himself… in 1995.
Before Mr. Hawking found the ‘Grand Design’ we were comfortable with the choice among the classic explanations of the creation of the Universe:
- That of physicists, who thought the Universe was created in an explosive big-bang and would continue its long expansive death. This cosmology is called in philosophical terms ‘monism’ and it is based in the study of the Universe with a single arrow of time=future, the arrow of expansive energy/entropy and death.
- That of philosophers, who thought mostly the Universe was eternal, without a principle or an end.
- And that of religions, who in the East thought the same than philosophers. Since Taoists, Buddhists and Hindus consider reality made of eternal cycles of creation and destruction, being the creation caused by Vishnu/Yin/information and destruction caused by Shiva/Yang/energy. This philosophy ads therefore a second arrow of time=future, information, and for that reason is called Duality or Dualism.
- While in the West, religions considered the Creator and Destroyer an entity, which participated of the qualities of man. Since we were made to the image and likeness of God. This type of religions are called Anthropomorphic religions.
-We shall latter in this post explain why today, the most advanced scientists of the XXI century – which are not physicists, stuck in their study of the single arrow of energy/death, but ignore everything about the ‘creative’ arrow of information and life – but Complexity theorists, who study both arrows, energy and information together, generally agree with the concepts of dualist philosophers and religions. Since we describe the Universe as an ‘organic fractal of energy and information’ in which the whole is self-similar to all its parts. Departing from this simple definition and thanks to the advancements we have made in the 2 fundamental languages of the human mind, logic and mathematics, we have been able to explain in a far more complex way the nature of God, Man and the Universe, and interesting enough, we have found that in this new complex view, the religious texts of old philosophers acquire a new meaning and can be used as mystique metaphors of the absolute. This came to me as an astounding surprise because I used to be like Mr. Hawking, a hardcore atheist, when I was a ‘child of thought’, making quantum doodles with the primitive logic and mathematics of the last millennium but now I have an immense respect for the Universe and the mystique parables in which its messages and mandates have been explained. But more of that latter.
Let us first consider Mr. Hawking’s theory of creation to explain at the end the scientific proofs we have found in Complexity theory of the Existence of God, the ‘creator of the Universe’ and its Grand Design.
If we were to use the same irony Mr. Hawking uses with all other scientists and philosophers in his book, we could say that the entire act of creation was forgotten in 1995, and the Universe started again from the scratch with the creation of the so called M-Theory, a mathematical nonsense, which is Mr. Hawking’s idea or rather personal agenda for a Grand Design. Let us remember that history.
In 1995 Edward Witten proposed the M-theory as a unification of all previous superstring theories. According to such ideas, the Universe was made of certain mathematical objects called strings, which existed in 11 dimensions, had never been observed, but were useful to simplify calculus about the inner regions of matter, strong forces and quarks.
How this local mathematical construct, without any proof has become then the center of Mr. Hawking’s creation? Easy: in 1996 String theory was used to analyze black hole thermodynamics, and someone deduced that with that mathematical construct it could be proved that black holes evaporated to the past as Mr. Hawking wanted it.
And so Alas! Mr. Hawking, who has been postulating for 30 years, against all experimental evidence and ‘sound’ mathematical work that black holes travel to the past, became an immediate convert to M-Theory, because it could help him to win the Nobel Prize.
Only that another 15 years have passed and we have not found a single proof of black hole evaporation but an enormous number of proofs that black holes follow Einstein’s Relativity theory and regardless of size (this is indeed the meaning of relativity), they all grow exponentially, exploding stars into supernovas and galaxies into quasars. But Mr. Hawking doesn’t believe either in Einstein, who he says ‘is double wrong’ (SciAm: ‘Quantum Black holes’). He believes in himself, the new Einstein, which he tells us in his biography was the name given to him by his companions in the school. This again seems a contradiction, since his best-seller book ‘A brief history of time’ is just a failed attempt to explain Einstein’s theories about time. But we have already anticipated Mr. Hawking’s work is full of contradictions. They are so many and so obvious, that we needed a bulky Pdf to explain them all.
The ‘Grand Design’ is unfortunately more of the same. Another science-fiction, self-promoting book, sparkled with sarcastic attacks to some true scientists like Feynman, philosophers and religions – the trademark that has made Mr. Hawking a celebrity of the scientific yellow press (there is indeed an increasing number of serious magazines that now publish absurd theories of science-fiction churned out as the new discovery, if possible with a lot of dimensions, parallel Universes and time travel artifacts.)
Yet when we get to the core of it, Mr Hawking merely tries to promote the falling tower of String theory, just a mathematical construct with zero respect for the experimental method, simply because if M-Theory is right black holes might evaporate to the past and Mr. Hawking would get his Nobel prize. Indeed, in the video we recorded during his conference at Pasadena, among friendly nuclear physicists , he explained us why he is backing CERN’s project of making black holes, even if ‘they can make us spaguetti’: because – he affirms – ‘in 30 years we have found no proof of black hole evaporation, but now CERN will give me a second chance, to win the Nobel Prize’.
A man with a Mission… Impossible. Since beyond Mr. Hawking’s God-like revelation of his power to create time travel machines and resurrect the dead, what Mr. Hawking has, is a basic misunderstanding of the 3 legs of truth of the scientific method – mathematical consistency, logic accuracy and experimental truth.
Indeed, Godel, Einstein’s best friend, proved long ago that mathematics are not truth per se but a mathematical equation can be a fantasy as a verbal sentence does, if it lacks logical consistency and doesn’t describe an experimental fact. That is why Einstein said to Poncaire: ‘I didn’t become a mathematician because while I always know when a mathematical equation is right or wrong I never know when it is real’.
So for a mathematical equation to be real, you need logic consistency, which Hawking’s work lacks, as ‘logic’ requires causality in time: A->B implies A causes B from past to future, not B causes A from future to past. And for that reason, because the Universe is logic and consistent there is no travel in time.The same can be said of M-Theory, since 11 dimensions are not logic; nor there is any known substance to those strings; neither what physicists call ‘background dependence’ makes sense. What this means is that those strings are somehow ‘floating’ over the true, ultimate substance of reality, Space and Time, described by Einstein in his Theory of Reality. So they cannot be the ultimate substance of reality which is Space and Time or rather the infinite Fractal Spaces and Temporal Cycles that carry the primeval energy and information of the Universe, the real substances of which we are all made.
Further on we need ‘experimental proofs’ to make Mr. Hawking’s ideas real, which do not exist either in black hole evaporation or M-String Theory.
So Mr. Hawking, according to Godel, can write Quixots, sorry M-Theories or Black Hole Thermodynamics that look beautiful in Math but are just mathematical puzzles. And this is indeed what M-Theory is: The mathematical construct of Mr. Witten, which requires 11 illogical dimensions, nowhere to be seen; travel in time, never observed; and the evaporation of black holes that would give Mr. Hawking a Nobel prize… All this of course has been said by Philosophers of science. But Hawking is a demigod of the celebrity industry of scientific best-sellers and so he cannot be denied. And yet – we say this man is full of contradictions – in other of his books he confesses that ‘when I read Godel, I got very depressed’ because he realized he could not find the meaning of it all only with mathematics. He seems though to have gotten out of his depression in this bold book, where he returns to what Philosophers of Science call ‘Pythagorism’, the belief that the Universe is a mere construct of numbers, probabilities and… M-theories.
But obviously, Hawking doesn’t like philosophers of science either. Since he also said ‘Philosophers of science rejected my work as naive and simplistic’, but ‘many of them are failed physicists who found it hard to invent new theories and so took to writing about the philosophy of physics instead’. And here, is indeed the core of the matter. Mr. Hawking ‘invents’ theories of reality and then pretends the Universe will follow his ‘creations’. And of course, this will put him above God, which he says doesn’t exist. Even if he affirmed in the same book (baby Universes) that he can ‘know the mind of God’. Now this conundrum is solved: Hawking has gone a notch further, beyond the arrogance of physicists like Kepler who said ‘God has waited 5000 years to find an intelligence like his to contemplate his clock work’ and Einstein who said ‘if my theory is wrong God should correct the Universe, so beautiful it is’.
We have now Hawking, who doesn’t believe in God’s creation but believes he can create the Universe with his mathematical sci-fi musings because he ‘knows the mind of God’. Ergo, if God doesn’t exist, if Witten and Hawking create the Universe and if Hawking understands the mind of God, HAWKING IS GOD!
Ts, ts, pity we didn’t realize of that before. Didn’t he travel in time to the past to explain this to Moses? We’ll have to repaint all the frescoes of Michelangelo, again!
Hawking in a nutshell: an ambitious lad who tried to emulate Einstein not with pen and paper, truly resolving the final questions the master left unresolved, and we have been advancing in Complexity theory (the meaning of mass and the Unification of charges and masses or the philosophically necessary, eternal Universe), but with all the wrong tricks of an unethical person – denying the master while making money with his theories; denying the scientific method; denying the right of all the inhabitants of this planet to live with his ‘risky’ promotion of black hole factories.
I know Hawking is ‘untouchable’ because of his disability. But disable people are first people with all the rights and duties of any moral human being. And this modern Strangelove must be judged by the quality of his work and the ethics of his actions, regardless of his neuronal atrophy. Unlike Heims, an extraordinary German physicist, impaired, who never became a celebrity because he was doing what true physicists should do – to publish papers and help to explain the Universe – Hawking has explained nothing but shamelessly exploited the compassion of people to make money. Indeed, in his ‘Brief history of Time’ about Einstein’s work, Einstein is not in the cover, but the ‘new Einstein’ – himself in his chair, occupies the stolen throne. In the past decades the ‘Hawking’s factory’ keeps churning books, written often by others for a price, with his stamped sign on it. And yet, because people are naive and good natured, the same people whose lives Hawking is putting at risk with his promotion of CERN’s black holes, adore him and truly believe he is the new Einstein…
Unfortunately as Mr. Higgs, his rival in God’s theories on this shameless Hall of Fame of CERN, puts it, his work is ‘not good enough’. Which obviously implies that Higgs does not believe in the evaporation of black holes, and so he believes we will all die if they are formed at CERN – but he also doesn’t mind to risk our lives to find his ‘toilet’ sorry ‘God’s particle’. Needless to say he is also in open denial of Einstein’s theory (reason why Nobel Prize Weinberg, called it with that schatological name), but he prefers to compare himself… with Maxwell, because ‘both are Scots’ – says the maestro in CERN’s self-promotional video.
All in all my thoughts are that God did indeed created the Universe and the World of Man, but now Mr. Hawking and Mr. Higgs are likely to destroy our World. And that I don’t respect.
Yet those ‘evil’=anti-live actions merely follow the traditions of physicists, who have made all the weapons of mass destruction of history… and in the process learned all about the arrow of energy and death that erases the information of life – reason why CERN has a statue to Shiva dancing over Kali in its courtyard.
But that energetic, simplistic description of the Cosmos uses only half of reality – a single arrow of future=time. The other half, fractal information – ‘form’, Vishnu, Yin in the philosophical tradition – that we Complexity theorists study is missing in all those faulty theories. Reason why Hawking has ran into the ‘information paradox’, since his black holes only have entropy, energy, so they have to evaporate information ‘to the past’. If that were truth of course, the Universe would be a dead, amorphous void. Since in/form/ation is the form of reality.
And so the fundamental law of science is the conservation of energy and information, rephrased by Complexity theorists: ‘energy never dies but trans/forms itself into another type of in/form/ation’.
This simple Law that widens the restricted ‘principle of conservation of Energy’ that only physicists like Hawking still use, since it includes also the arrow of information that creates the future, trans/forming energy in form. But Hawking is stuck in century old, monist, entropy-only interpretations of reality, as most physicists at CERN are. And so they think that by destroying the Universe or the world with a big-bang explosion they will explain the meaning of it all.
Yet, they will only explain the tautological fact of death: energy kills; death is an overdrive of energy as in an accident, or when you are killed by a weapon, a machine that produces an overload of energy, in this case CERN’s quark cannon…
Thus if those experiments continue, Faustus will ‘likely’ play a final dirty trick on Hawking and all of us, who didn’t dare to defy the ‘high priest’ of ‘catastrophysics’: those black holes won’t evaporate to the past but swallow the Earth…
I am as certain of this as I am certain that there is indeed a Grand Design… because God doesn’t play with dices, nor Einstein is double wrong.
On the contrary God did create the Universe and we, complexity theorists have proved it with the right tools of science, the scientific and experimental method.
So let us go on with more serious matters than Mr. Hawking’s self-promoting book and explain that Grand Design, both with the jargon of science (logic and mathematics) and with the jargon of classic philosophy and religion (words). Because one of the first things we should learn is that while the Universe is one, ‘the languages of God are infinite’ (Upanishads). In other terms, the Grand Design can be explained with logic words, with mathematics and with mystique metaphors, as classic religions did. And though I am a scientist more inclined to use logic and mathematics, I am also an artist that can feel the beauty of the metaphors of religions, explaining that Grand Design. So we shall first translate those metaphors, which Mr. Hawking and so many other scientists, unable to understand, wrongfully scorn.
God created the Universe: the grand design.
In the graph, in complexity sciences, the Universe is no longer a mechanism but a fractal organism, and each of its self-similar parts are also super-organisms. What religions do is to study two kinds of those super-organisms: the Universal super-organism, whose Laws of Science are its ‘Mind’ or God; and the super-organisms of History, made of human ‘cells’, which have the same ‘memetic Codes’ of Revelation, the same information, in each believers minds. Those are the Gods of History, as Saint John did explain: ‘and the wor(l)d=God, became man and inhabited among us’.
Let us now deal with the discoveries that we, complexity theorists, have done and back the classic theories of philosophers and religions – neither of which are dead or want to sacrifice their lives for Mr. Hawking’s Faustian glory – departing from the previous, fundamental principle of Science, which was known since the beginning of the XX century, but we formalized in our work on complexity, non-euclidean mathematics, fractal theory and system sciences, the past decade – the Principle of Conservation of Energy and Information:
‘Energy never dies but trans/forms itself into another type of in/form/ation: E<=>I’.
In my scholar papers as chair of the science of Duality, which precisely studies the Universe using both arrows of Time, energy and Information, as Eastern Philosophers did in the past (Taoism, Buddhism, Hinduism), but with the mathematical tools of fractal and Non-Euclidean theory and the wealth of scientific data collected in the past centuries, I have explained how departing from that simple Law and ‘generator equation’, we can explain the creation of the Universe, its laws, particles, forms, organisms and Grand Design.
Here I will try now to explain that design in simple terms, and refer to the reader to our webs on Social sciences and Complexity, for further understanding of the grand design.
But first, it is needed to do something physicists never do – to define in logic terms the words they use, like wave, particle, time, space, as we do in Complexity Theory. In this case we are concerned with the definition of the word God, which is a verbal term that must be understood in the context of History of Religions.
Or else, questions like ‘God created the Universe’ make no sense at all.
In this post, from our web, www.economicstruth.com, dedicated to the study of History and Economics with the tools of complexity and system sciences, you can have a wider analysis of the meaning of God in Human History. In simple terms, we must understand the definition of God, which is dual, as it greatly differs in the Western, anthropomorphic culture and the Eastern one.
Let us then go part by part, by making clear the basic definitions of God and the Universe in system sciences:
‘The Universe is a organic fractal of energy and information’
‘In Eastern religions, God is the Mind of the Universe, the organic laws of energy and information that generate all its self-similar fractal parts, physical species made of fields of energy and particles of information; and living species, made of bodies of energy and heads of information’.
In the Universe, there is not only an arrow of entropy and death, but also an arrow of fractal information, which has the qualities of life. All species in the Universe absorb energy, gauge information (even particles, reason why their theories are called gauge theories), reproduce (quarks absorb energy and reproduce jets of ‘quarkitos’, so do electrons that absorb energy and break into a shower of new electrons, and since those are the two basic particles of reality, it follows that all systems can be reproduced), and finally, all entities of the Universe evolve eusocially, gathering together into bigger super-organisms, from particles that become atoms that become molecules that become cells that become living organisms that become societies, nations and religions, super-organisms of History.
So we can now define also the Gods of History:
‘In Western Religions, God is the collective human mind of a super-organism of History, the collective subconscious advanced by Philosophers of Religion like Jung or Campbell, either the subconscious collective of a tribal super-organism. So Yvwh is the subconscious collective of the Jewish People and the Book of Yvwh, the Bible, the book of History of the Jewish people; while ‘America’ is the subconscious collective of the people of America. While in more evolved religions, which accept all people, not only those belonging to a nation or tribe, ‘Sons=Cells of God’, God is the subconscious collective of all Mankind (Christianity, Islam, Socialist doctrines).
Again, the self-simmilarity with organic systems is clear. In an organic system, each cell carries a DNA/informative code, which is exclusive to the organism. It doesn’t matter the content of the code as long as all cells follow that code, and so they act together as a single organism, sharing energy and information among them.
The same happens in a religion: the minds of all their human cells share the same Book of Revelation, the memetic code that creates the Religious Superorganism. It doesn’t matter the details of the content of the Koran or the Gospel or the Talmud – what matters is that all the cells have the same mental DNA, which makes them love each other, sharing energy and information among the believers, which create in this manner a stronger Organism that the individual.
The same happens in nations, which share the same informative language and legal codes, becoming a super-organism of History.
The difference between a religion and a nation is thus subtle. In the past, the word nation did not exist, so people used the word God. Yvwh was the God of the Jewish people and his book of history was therefore a book of God. Yvwh was fighting Assur, the God of the Assyrian people, whose capital was also called Assur, and whose king was called ‘son of God’, Assurbanipal. Then the Romans invented the word nation and Rome no longer was a God…
Do those superorganisms/Gods of History exist, as your organism exists independent of its cells? In the more complex books and texts of complexity it can be mathematically and logically proved that indeed, the Universe is a fractal of multiple ‘scales’ of superorganisms, and while we do not observe ‘as a single organism’ bigger forms than ourselves, they might exist in those other scales (since we do not see the flows of ‘invisible information’ that joins them, as we do not see gravitational information that joins together the organic systems of galaxies, only its energetic networks). This theme is fascinating and explained in detail in my book ‘The Cycles of Time: God, man and Universe’, unfortunately published only in Spanish, but for the dedicated reader, here there is a link to Non-AE Theology.
What matters in any case is to understand the duality of Universal God religions and anthropomorphic God religions and their relationship with the most advanced science of the XXI C. which is not Quantum Physics, but Complexity, and the study of the Universe with the two arrows of time.
Thus, if the Universe and all its parts follow the laws of super-organisms, which define all what exists as ‘organic fractals made of self-similar cells joined by networks of energy and information’, this ORGANIC GRAND DESIGN OF REALITY, which we complex theorists have developed both logically and mathematically departing from the Law of Conservation of Energy and Information, explains both, the Universe, the nature of the Absolute God – the bio-logic, organic laws of that Universe – and the nature of the Human God, the subconscious collective mind of Mankind=History, which is the ‘collective brain’ of the super-organism of Gaia, our body.
Then we have a simple definition/template, the great design, which shows all what exists is indeed a fractal organism, self-similar to the whole Universe:
A super-organism is a system of self-similar cells joined by networks of energy and information
Then you can substitute for each species of the Universe, the type of cell and the networks of energy and information and obtain a specific superorganism.
For example the Universe would be a ‘superorganism of galaxies joined by networks of dark energy and gravitational information’
Since gravitation attracts, forms, in/forms galaxies.
A galaxy would be a ‘superorganism of stars, joined by networks of electromagnetic energy and gravitational information’.
A human being would be a ‘superorganism of DNA-cells, joined by networks of nervous information and blood energy’
And a human god would be a ‘superorganism of human cells, joined by verbal networks of information and economical networks of energy’
Simple, isn’t? We don’t need indeed M-Theory and the God-like Mind of Mr. Hawking, to understand it all.
We just need to be humble and marvel to the beauty of the fractal, self-repetitive, organic Universe, we have discovered with the wisdom of old religions and the knowledge of modern science. Pity, all that will go to waste when CERN tries to evaporate black holes, to give Mr. Hawking, a second chance.
But there is more much more to the great design and to fully grasp it, we need to go a step further and switch from the language of words in which Philosophy, Religions and Biology are written, into the languages of pure science, the geometric language of space and the logic language of time, the language of causality between past and future that Hawking denies, when it is in fact the most important language of the Universe.
Since those 2 languages are also being evolved by Complexity theorists, NOT by physicists, as the first step to achieve a more accurate description of reality and all its self-similar parts and scales, each one studied by a different science. Indeed, if man is made to the image and likeness of God, the Mind of Information of the Universe, it follows that our minds are still the most complex ‘form’ of the Universe, not a machine like CERN. So it is in the evolution of the languages of the mind, where we will find the keys to the ‘detailed’ analysis of the cosmos, which the verbal language and the metaphors of religions describe in its ‘general thoughts’.
Let us then have a brief glimpse to the other ‘language of the mind’ in which reality is written, the language of logic time and how Complexity and Duality illuminates also the most important question humans have ever wonder: why we live and die.
The logic design: causality from past to future: the 4 arrows of time.
In the Universe there are infinite times=changes, one for each ‘species’ that undergoes a change process, the meaning of the word ‘time’. Those types of changes are the so-called arrows of time, which all beings of the Universe follow in their life and death cycles. The main of those arrows is the arrow of ‘relative future’ or life aging that creates information. We are made of ‘yang’, vital energy, which time curves into ‘information’, yin, back and forth in the cycles of life (growth of form, or aging) and death (loss of it). Yet the simplification of all those arrows and cycles of time into a single clock-cycle blurred the understanding of biological time and life-death cycles. Clocks became ever since the ‘seers of time’ of our culture. And organicism faded away, while a simpler, mechanist philosophy of reality imposed its idolatry to clocks, today evolved into computers that render the verbal mind of man obsolete.
‘I know what is time, if I only could explain it’, said Saint Augustine, with humble thoughts. He also called ‘God’, the mind of the Universe the ‘seer of time’ -and he was right. The Logic time is indeed the ultimate truth of reality, a logic he affirmed would be ‘more complex than the logic of man’, as it is indeed. Since physicists only use an arrow of future to try to emulate the design of the Universe and Time has 4 ‘organic arrows’ dimensions, that paint reality as it is. Since God indeed is as Leonardo put it ‘a painter of vital forms’, we might ad a ‘painter of 4 dimensions’, of 4 strokes.
But then it came Galileo which measured time with clocks and Kepler with no so humble thoughts affirmed that God, which Saint Augustine had called the ‘seer of time’, had waited 5000 (biblical) years to find an intelligence like his to enjoy his clockwork. And so from the respect of earlier verbal philosophers of time, who peered into the mystery of its 3 dimensions, past, present and future, we moved into the work of clock-makers, Galileo, Kepler and then Einstein who told us that ‘time is what a clock measures’. And when asked if he might be wrong, he answered back, then ‘God should change the Universe and adapt it to my theory’. And that’s it. Because, after all how can you argue with people who think they deserve to correct God because his intelligence is self-similar to His? And needless to say miles ahead of all those of us, mere mortals who do not make clocks?
Yes indeed, humans have surpassed all species of the Universe including God, its impersonal mind, in one thing, sheer arrogance, ego and sense of self-importance, despite being just a self-similar, minuscule fractal part of it all, which will be repeated and repeat the same discoveries that infinite self-similar fractal parts in the eternal past, present and future of time.
May I then differ slightly on the definition of time as what a clock measures, and return to the wisdom of those earlier verbal philosophers, stating simply that time is the perception of change, all type of changes in the Universe, which can be perceived/measured/gauged with any sense or language of information, words, numbers, clocks, computers, eyes, sounds and waves?
It matters in that sense not only to acquire information about times=changes, but also to use a language that we humans naturally understand, and that language is words with their past, present and future verbs. And so we have in fact two theories about time=change, the theory of biologists, which is verbal, called Evolution Theory and the theory about time=change of physicists, which is mathematical.
And this is ok, because those two languages are better suited to describe the specific times=changes that both sciences study. Biologists study the change in the morphology of beings, and the life/death cycles of those beings, and for that they need indeed to use the concepts of past, present and future, and understand the form, the in/form/ation of beings. While physicists study the change in the motion of beings in space, and for that they need to measure the changes of their speeds, which is better measured with clocks and described with a simple formula that relates all those terms, v=s/t.
But we need to study both sciences of time together, harmonize both theories and upgrade them to the higher understanding of the fractal paradigm to truly explain what time is and satisfy Augustine.
It is a fact of history that humans first discover machines and then invent theories of reality that adapt to them and become dogma. But they never recognize the influence of those machines and the bias they introduce in their perception of the Universe. Of all the ideologies of our mechanist world none is stronger than the ideology of the time-clock, which appeared with the invention of mechanical clocks and has fogged, ever since, our comprehension of the Universe. The idea brought about by the discovery of the clock is that time, the perception of change in the Universe, can only be understood with ‘mechanical clocks’; and so, as Time is only ‘one’, because those first scientists used only one ‘clock-rhythm’ to measure it. This absurd belief in a single time for all the Universe dates back to the use of clocks by Galileo and Descartes and subsists, even a century after Einstein proved that different regions of the Universe have different rhythms of time=change. We didn’t need, however, to wait 400 years to the arrival of General Relativity to understand the obvious – that each species and organism of the Universe has its own biological rhythms of time, of life and death, of creation and extinction, of information and energy.
All theories of science about time depart from the first scientist of History, discoverer of the experimental method, Aristotle, who also defined the blueprint of a Time Theory that still stands as the origin of all other scientific philosophies of time. Aristotle defined time as change and so he affirmed that a theory of time should be a theory of change. Then he proposed, as Eastern philosophers did, 2 arrows, wills or substances in the Universe, information and energy, responsible for the 2 types of ‘times’=changes science studies. His wording, though, was somehow more complex. He called the arrow of temporal information, morphological, informative change, which happens in the processes of aging, death and evolution. And he called the arrow of temporal energy, translational change or change in movement and energy, which happens mainly in the physical realm. Thus, he divided the study of times in 2 different sciences, Biology, the science of form, of in-form-ation and Physics, the science of energy and matter. In the modern age, those 2 types of times-changes would be studied by Darwin in Biology and Galileo and Einstein in Physics. They added a new language, mathematics, to calculate with more precision those times= changes; and a new type of device, a machine, called the clock that would measure the rhythm of those times = changes.
The myth that time is what a clock measures.
However, physicists were only able to mathematize one of both arrows: energy, expansive movement in space, which they called ‘entropy’. Because physicists ignore all what they cannot mathematize, this lead them to ignore the 2nd arrow of time, in-form-ation. Further on, they studied all types of changes with a single rhythm of change; that of a mechanical clock. Thus, soon a ‘mechanical bias’ was introduced in physical time studies: all the times=changes of the Universe became equalized with one specific ‘time’, the time of the clock. Soon the existence of multiple times=changes was forgotten and the concept of a single artificial time=change in the universe – that of the clock – became standard. So Times were reduced to ‘Time’ and an absurd idea was born: there is only a single time in the Universe; that of the clock; and a single arrow of future time – energy and movement, mathematized as entropy. This is what philosophers of science, which are not constrained by the ‘straightjacket’ of clocks, the single language of mathematics and the worldly profession of making weapons, have for very long denounced as an aberration of physics, called reductionism, or ‘lineal clock-time’. But science is technology and technology is power. So hand in hand with the development of ‘lineal time’, physicists evolved ‘lineal weapons’ that release energy and kill the information of life. Since life was now secondary, this ‘collateral effect’ of modeling a dying Universe built only with energy, was no longer a moral question. The Industrial revolution and the expansion of the white man’s empires, based in the energy of steam machines, consecrated those ideas. Entropy, defined in terms of heat and steam, became the glorifying principle of reality; while life and information, the weak element, could be ignored, because physicists had killed ‘theoretically’ the Universe. Philosophers again talked of the ‘spatialization’ of time, which was now dependant of energy and movement. In mathematical terms, it all comes to Galileo’s a formula to measure the changes=times of motion, through the use of mechanical clocks, in which time appeared only as a dimension of speed and space: V=s/t, t=v/s. So the second arrow of future, the evolution of information, the arrow of life and its cycles, was forgotten. And when Einstein improved on that formula, adding a –ct factor (related to the speed of light), the absurd concept that time is ‘only’ the 4th dimension of (motion in) space, became dogma. And so today, physicists consider that Darwin was irrelevant to time theory; that Aristotle was irrelevant to time theory; that Time doesn’t happen in History; that the cycle of life and death is irrelevant.
This of course is false. In fact, it would be Einstein, the first person to mathematize properly the arrow of biological time, described by Aristotle and Darwin, when he discovered a formula e x t = K, which states that the product of energy and time frequency (synonymous of in-form-ation), of any system is constant. What that equation meant was however not fully understood till we, Complexity scientists, refounded the science of Duality, with models of the Universe that use, unlike physics which works only with the arrow of energy/entropy, both arrows of time, information and energy… What Duality found is that by using both arrows together, most of the questions not responded by physics and biology alone could be solved. The more important of those questions was the life and death cycle, which Einstein’s equation explained perfectly. And we shall now consider here, as I have applied it extensively to different sciences, including the understanding of history and the ages of its civilizations.
So we need to return to a more sophisticated theory of ‘times’, which fusions the work of Einstein’s Relativity and Darwin’s Evolution, the modern fathers of time theory in Physics and Biology. And the key to such advance in time theory is precisely to go beyond the mechanist concept of ‘time is what a clock measures’ and return to the pre-clock, verbal, biological understanding of time, as the ‘modes of changes’ of the energy and information of the Universe – the 2 elements of reality. Since time is the perception of those modes of change in the Universe, which can be observed with any type of ‘informative and energetic devices’ not only with clocks.
Times, as they were always understood before we narrowed the concept to the rhythms of the clock, are the different processes of change of the energy or ‘yang’ and information or ‘yin’ we observe in the Universe. And we can classify all those processes with the 2 x 2 arrows of time-change, as mere increases or decreases of energy or information, or as complex combinations of both:
— There are simple processes in time that increase or decrease the energy or entropy of the system, creating the arrow of entropy, the only one ‘monist’, ‘mechanist’ science recognizes, since it is the only arrow their mechanic clocks can measure, as their spiral mechanism uncoils its form into energy. It is also the arrow of death, as death is a simplification of the information of life, which energy destroys.
•There are simples processes in time that increase or decrease the information of the system, such as aging, or evolution and so they create the arrow of information or negantropy (opposed to entropy), of the Universe, which is the ‘arrow of future’, as we all age with time and so we acquire more form, ‘more in-form-ation’. Or in words of Einstein: ‘Time curves, forms space’. This obviously means that energy simplifies information and it is therefore the arrow of relative ‘past’ of all beings, to which they return when they are devolved in the process of death. And so these 2 simple processes are related: species that diminish in energy normally are increasing their information and vice versa, species that decrease information increase energy.
— There are complex processes that repeat or reproduce a system, making reality to seem eternal. It is the arrow of ‘relative present’, or reproduction which repeats and combines energy and information in other place of space-time.
— And finally, there are complex processes that evolve socially individual cells into super-organisms by attaching them to complex networks of energy, which are ‘blood or economical system’ in the organisms of man and history and networks of information, networks of which are ‘nervous or financial/legal systems’ in the organisms of man and history. Networks of energy and information, normally made of a different ‘kind of cells’, evolve individuals into social structures, that create most of the complex forms we see around us, from cells to societies. It is the arrow of social evolution and love, explained by classic religions, which in System sciences we call the arrow of ‘Emergence’, as it makes emerge from individual parts, the whole: full-grown organisms. So it creates galaxies with stars, molecules with atoms, cells with molecules and societies with human beings.
For those who do not have the imagination and poetic sense required to understand those 4 arrows of time/mandates of existence, expressed both in religions and organic sciences, either because they are literalists (religious fundamentalists that will tell you that the Universe was indeed created in 7 days and the Apple of the Tree of Science was indeed an apple), or pythagorics (who think only mathematical equations describe the Universe) we need to make some clarifications.
- The religious literalist must understand that the messages of God, the Wor(l)d that inhabits among us, through the verb of its prophets, are translations of the biological, natural code of all species. So the details of that code merely reflect the need to translate to each culture the message, which essentially is: ‘follow the biological drives of existence of all organisms, including man: ‘Grow=feed on energy and information and multiply=reproduce’ and ‘Evolve socially:love each other as I have loved you’. This is how the Universe self-explains within the part called mankind, the 4 arrows/dimensions of the Grand Design.
If we were a particle, those 4 ‘commandments’ will be written with 4 quantic numbers that express the fact that particles feed on energy, gauge information, reproduce its cycles of form and evolve socially in herds and quantum organisms called atoms.
- The mathematical pythagorist should then understand that mathematics, beings as it is one of the most extended languages of ‘God’, the mind of the Universe, is not the ultimate language, but merely the description of how this grand design creates form in space.
We are all ‘atmans’, souls of energy and information (Buddhist jargon), ‘monads that aperceive reality’ (Leibniz jargon), quantum knots that feed on forces of energy and gauge information reproducing/splitting into new particles (modern physics) and so on. We, all the true prophets/masters of knowledge who have seen that perennial philosophy (Huxley) know that, feel it in the communion with all things made to the image and likeness of the organic whole. Only the literalists and pythagorist miss it.
The 3 ages of all organic, temporal species. Why we live and die.
Let us now go a step further in our understanding of the organic structure of the Universe. To that aim, we shall consider how those fundamental arrows of time, much more sophisticated that the mere use of an arrow of entropy or motion – the simplest of those 4 arrows – can be described mathematically thanks to Einstein’s discovery that the product of energy and temporal information of any system, ext=k, is constant.
Since that equation includes the 3 essential arrows of the Universe, not only one arrow as a clock does:
The arrow of spatial, expansive energy, e; the arrow of cyclical clocks that store temporal information, Ti; and the product of them, k, or arrow of reproduction.
It is also obvious that mathematically we can express the previous equation in 3 forms:
Max. E x Min. Ti = K (energetic youth) ; E=K=Ti (classic, reproductive Maturity) and Min. E x Max. Ti=K (3rd age of information).
Thus there are 3 possible stages or ages of evolution of the equation of biological time. And since we are all made of ‘energy’ and ‘temporal information’, those 3 stages must be the stages, or phases of any system of the Universe. This finding, which is perhaps the most important discovery of Theory of Time of the XXI century, is validated by all kind of empirical observations. For example, the 3 states of matter correspond to those 3 equations. Gas (maximal energy), liquid (balanced energy and information) and solid (Maximal information. They are also the 3 possible solutions of a cosmological system: the big bang of maximal energy, a steady state of balance and a big crunch of maximal information. In the graph, we show further examples of those equations.
Here we are interested in its application to the understanding of life and history. If we call the age of maximal energy, youth, the age of balance between energy and information, the reproductive, mature age, and the age of maximal information the old age, we have a simple description of the fundamental cycle of life and death through its 3 ages.
But we can also write those dynamic processes backwards. And so we have the inverse equation of life ages, the equation of death, when after accumulating maximal information, a species reverses its arrow of information and explodes that information into energy. It is the process or equation of death.
So life is an arrow of information, E-> I, and death its inversion, I-> E. So simple, so beautiful, so misunderstood by mechanist scientists, who think the previous equation is ‘uncertain’, because the observer can perceive a particle in any of those 3 states (Uncertainty principle of quantum physics). When I explain the equation of life and death in scientific congresses, all people marvel except dogmatic physicists, with their religions of the machine. Now they are building, based in a misinterpretation of that equation, black holes on Earth (Mr. Hawking and CERN), thinking that the equation of life and death is ‘uncertain’. And the reversion of that equation – the process of death of a particle that becomes its antiparticle and explodes in a big bang of energy – is a system to travel back in time. But what they will get if they succeed making black holes will be an explosion as nothing ever seen on the Earth…
The reason why death exists in a perfect, immortal Universe is obvious: if species only evolved socially towards more information, they would end into a ‘big crunch’. So the Universe and all its parts should have, long ago, reached a point of social evolution and maximal density, with no return. To avoid this, the ‘game of life and death’ exists, whereas death is the opposite arrow to Social evolution, as it dissolves the networks that put together individual cells, breaking the super-organism back into its parts. But we are now concerned with the arrow of life.
The ±1 social arrow has, in fact, 2 directions:
The positive, +1, social arrow of cellular evolution creates life and makes a being emerge at birth.
The -1, negative arrow of cellular dissolution kills life and dissolves a being into its cells and atoms. Thus, it is the key arrow of the life/death cycles that clock-time misses. Hence the enormous simplification of those 4 time-arrows, brought about by clocks, which in Physics, since Galileo, only measure the first and most simple of those arrows, the energy of motion.
The result of adding both – the life and the death processes – in any system or scale of reality is a ‘zero-sum’ of information+entropy that cyclically returns reality to its initial form, in a dynamic, multiple steady state balance that affects any entity of reality. The study of that process of creation and dissolution of complex structures, however, cannot be made with translational time, (v=S/T), the realm of physics, but it needs to understand biological, morphological time – the life/death cycle and its 3±1 ages. Those ages explain precisely what physicists, stuck in the study of time as movement in space, will never understand: the meaning of the life and death cycle that creates and extinguishes humans, societies (super-organisms of human beings) and all kind of beings that exist in space and time. In biological time all universal species follow the same ‘morphological changes’, described by the wisdom of verbal thought as the 3±1 ages of life, each one ruled by one of the 3±1 change=time:
+1: Conception: ruled by social evolution, as a micro-organism or cell transcends into a macro-organism, organized by social networks.
1st age: Youth or Age of energy.
2nd age: Energy and Information Reproduce.
3rd age: All energy becomes information.
-1:Death: The inverse of conception when the super-organism dissolves back into cells.
In the graph we describe that law of 3±1 ages, cycles, or horizons of evolutions for the fundamental species of reality. To understand that cycle in depth, we have to recall the Law of Complementarity between energy and information: all systems are made with a body/field of energy and a head/particle of information.
Further on, since form is made with energy, all events must start with an amount of ‘simple’ energy that transforms itself into information, the only other primary direction/arrow of time to go. Then, when all energy is consumed, warped into information, death reverses its cycle. Yet in the middle of that cycle, when information and energy are in balance, to preserve the ‘bio-logic’ form created in that process, the system achieves its reproduction.
And so the ‘offspring’ of the being will carry on its information into the future. Information never disappears as it always recreates itself.
All beings, from fundamental particles, (electrons and quarks) to human beings and life species, reproduce or are reproduced by more complex systems, when they have extra-energy to imprint its in-form-ation. Since forms that do not reproduce, die away and become extinct. So even those deconstructed beings that cannot reproduce alone are reproduced by other species. For example, cells reproduce carbohydrates, galaxies reproduce stars and human reproduce machines in factories. Thus, we talk of 3±1 drives, arrows or ages of existence in all systems: the drive for body energy, the drive for information, the drive for reproduction and the drive of social d=evolution (birth and death of a macro-organism). Whereas the 3±1 ages of Organic Time are merely the order in which those 3±1 drives ‘accumulate’ during the life/death cycle of any species.
In a young first age, energy is more abundant. In the mature age of balance, the species reproduces, combining energy and information. In the third age of the species, energy is scarce but information is abundant, accumulated in the first ages.
Young people are full of energy. They are in the Energy horizon of the species. They are bigger, have little temporal knowledge. They are simple in form. While Old people are full of information. They are in the information horizon of the species. They are smaller, as all information systems are and have a lot of temporal memories. They move little and have a lot of wrinkles.
Mature people balance the two elements of the organic Universe, their content of energy-space and temporal information. So they can reproduce all their components. Hence the 2nd age is the age of reproduction. And the forms of any being in that mature age are a harmonic, an efficient combination of energy lines and informative cycles that we perceive as ‘beautiful’, the objective perception of harmony between energy and information, lines and cycles. So in all organisms the mature, realistic, classic age of balance, or reproductive age, is the most perfect age. Human beings intuitively see that. We like balanced, spiral galaxies, mature people and realist art, which is called classic art and takes place in the mature age of civilizations.
Yet, the dominant arrow of time, information, will finally exhaust energy, warp totally the organism and bring its explosive death. And the cycle will start again.
It follows that a true science of life and time will try to maintain any organism in its age of balance, without excessive information. Exactly the contrary of what our society does. Since humans accumulate scientific and technological information towards a point or ‘Singularity’ in which that information, in the form of a robot or artificial intelligence, might extinguish us.
In the graphs, we illustrate those 3±1 ages with a few universal examples, also from social sciences: we see the process in individual human beings, in art, the collective brain of a culture; in matter, where those ages are called the states of matter – energetic gas, reproductive liquid and informative solid. And finally in the Universe, where stars evolve from an age of energy into an informative age as black holes. And so do galaxies that evolve from energetic nebulae into Black Holes, which explode into quasars. Finally, if the network of galaxies we call the Universe was truly born from a first seed of matter that fed and reproduced its form in the energy of the vacuum; it will go through 3±1 self-similar ages described by the 3 solutions to Einstein’s Space-time equations. Since all in the Universe is a game of ‘3’ dimensions or ages of time: past, the age of energy, present, the reproductive age in which all systems repeat themselves to keep their ‘present form’ beyond death and a 3rd age, when all energy is exhausted, trans-form-ed into form, information.
Thus, clock-time cannot describe, as it is qualitative, morphologic, not quantitative, the cycle of death and life, from youth-energy into a 3rd age-information and back again, dissolving yourself into the Universe, natural to all beings: Energy always trans-forms itself.
So the 4 arrows of time have an absolute order defined by those life ages, which first evolve socially a seminal seed into a macro-organism of multiple cells, according to the arrow of social evolution and then trans-form the energy of youth into in-form-ation in 3±1 ages dominated by the arrows of energy, reproduction and information, creating the fundamental arrow of the life/death cycle, the arrow of information or future arrow that happens in all systems:
It is the main law of physics, discovered by Einstein, who said: ‘time curves (the energy of) space into mass (a vortex of Information)’.
It is the main law of Biology, discovered by Darwin, who said: that time evolves the form of organisms.
In Chemistry, Mehaute realized that when chemical compounds do not increase their entropy, they increase their information, forming fractal structures. It was the mathematical breakthrough of modern organicism. Since for the first time we had a mathematical paradigm, ‘fractal, self-generative equations’ able to describe the reproduction of information. Fractal mathematics showed how all systems could reproduce in-form-ation by breaking energy into ‘smaller forms’, in a mechanical, vegetative or conscious way.
Finally, it is also the main law of History, as human civilizations constantly increase their technological information, but unable to repress military technology, the bad fruits of the tree of science, end up in extinctive wars. So they also live and die through those 3±1 ages/arrows of time.
So the meaning of Life and death is no longer a mystery, but an organic process of reproduction and self-organization, guided by the 4 arrows of time that we can extend to all systems made of the 2 fundamental, dual ‘reproductive particles’, informative quarks and spatial, energetic electrons; that is, to all systems of the Universe. In that sense, mechanism, after we have observed the reproductive capacity of those ultimate particles of reality, is no longer ‘a science’ but a dogmatic, anthropomorphic ‘religion’ that stubbornly tries to differentiate human beings, as ‘special entities’ surrounded by a lesser Universe of dead matter. Indeed, the founders of mechanism, Descartes, Newton and Kepler, were pious believers, which thought their new theory of the Universe would reinforce those beliefs in the superiority of man, chosen of God, to rule the Universe. As Kepler said, ‘God has waited 5000 (biblical years) to find an intelligence (Kepler himself) able to understand His’. Yet there is no difference of quality between the arrows of time of a quark and those of a human being, only degrees of complexity, as we are made of multiple scales of self-organization and so we carry much more information than quarks do. Thus, the key to our ‘complexity’ is the 4th arrow of social evolution that joins individual cells into social networks that emerge as ‘new super-organisms’ of a higher scale.
And what about mathematics? How do we reconcile in complexity the ‘organic design’ with the mathematical one? Are not mathematical abstract, fixed concepts, geometrical constructs that have little to do with life? No really, because in complexity we have also evolved our mathematical understanding of the Universe, thanks to fractal geometry and the completition of Non-Euclidean geometry, whose 4 remaining postulates (Einstein only used the 5th one), I introduce to the world of science in the 50th anniversary of the creation of Complex sciences at the International Systems Society in Sonoma… This again is an advance that comes from the evolution of the languages humans use to perceive the Universe, not from machines observations, and so it will during the XXI century, if we survive CERN, illuminate many different sciences as the complex logic of the 4 arrows of time (energy, information, reproduction and social evolution) will also do.
The Mathematical and Logic design, going beyond Euclid, Einstein and Aristotle.
The true advances in sciences have always departed from the evolution of mathematics and logic, the languages of space and time of the human kind, and then with those languages, each science has evolved its perspective in one of the ‘fractal scales’ of reality. The pretension of physics of being the mother of all sciences is absurd. It is merely the simplest of them, which studies the simplest forms of energy. But if we consider the 2nd arrow of ‘creation’ of reality, that of form, of information, biology which studies the most complex forms of information (life) and religion, which goes a step further into Human Societies and the Organic laws of the Universe (eastern religions) are the summit of science. Yet humans today despise their own minds and treat those of us who advance the Universal understanding of those languages as crackpots, because we do not use money, weapons and machines, the totems of our civilization but the power of our minds, still the most perfect instruments of thought deviced in this corner of the Galaxy. In the graph, the first step on that process of evolution of human languages requires to redefine the Philosophy of Mathematics and its basic postulates, adapting them to the Non-Euclidean, fractal geometry of space and time. This task was done by this writer during the last decades, opening up a new r=evolution in our understanding of reality no longer as an abstract mechanism of ‘points without parts and without motion’, but as a series of fractal networks of cellular points that exchange waves of energy and information. Mathematics and reality became closer and we finally understood the vital design of the Cosmos.
We said that in the new Age of Science that Complexity and Systems science has started, the Universe is no longer a simple, monist mechanism, but an organism. And the goal of the Universe is to create such organic networks – it is the Grand Design which people like Hawking pretend to know – by inventing it with null respect to the laws of the scientific method, but they can’t and will never find with a single arrow of energy and the mechanical concept they have inherited from the ‘religious’, pious, calvinist founding fathers of this religion of the machine like Kepler, who said ‘God has waited 5500 (biblical) years to find an intelligence like His to see his clockwork’ or Newton, who thought God sent him messages through his comets. Not so, because we are nothing but a fractal, self-repetitive part of that design. Whereas the design in itself is created with the bio-logic of organic systems, a type of logic more complex than the logic of Aristotle that scientists of the past millennium used. Or we might say in a more accurate way that the logic of organism creates the fractal, mathematical patterns of the Universe and not vice versa. But to reach there, we have first to evolve our understanding of mathematics and logic, and this requires to redefine the 5 postulates of Euclidean mathematics and the postulates of Aristotelian, causal logic – not as Hawking does, denying them, but evolving them. This can be done as I have shown in my books with extreme complexity or as I will try to do here, with simplicity, because the beauty of the Universe is precisely the possibility to create parables, put examples and simplify the grand design to its ultimate components, so even an atom can follow that design.
Let us then start where science arrived before the sci-fi writers like Hawking degraded our discipline, re-inventing the Universe.
The point we were in was that of Einstein. At his death, the best minds of the planet met at the Macy’s congress and bow to evolve his vision of the Universe, by adding the arrow of information to the mix. Thus complexity and system sciences were born. It took it though 50 years till the Sonoma Congress in which I completed the job of defining in logic and mathematical terms this science to formalize the great insights of many masters during those 50 years. And so we shall take it from then, connecting what we have done with the work of Einstein, the previous master – being Hawking and Higgs and other unethical, arrogant, ignorant, baroque writers just an hiatus of confusion that will pass either because we die all due to their theories or we survive and their theories become trashed when their celebrity status and mass-media backing dies away.
Einstein had left the task of understanding reality earlier on at a point in which we knew that the Universe was not Euclidean. Since he had realized that the points of gravitational space of that Universe could be crossed by infinite parallels. This was a puzzle which he used in his Relativity theory but didn’t quite figure out in its meaning. Mandelbrot came then and realized that the Universe was fractal. That is, self-similar structures repeated at smaller scales, and so when we enlarged reality again a new ‘plane of existence’ appeared that was similar to the whole. It was left to put together both facts and expand the Non-Euclidean mathematics of Riemann and Einstein to encompass all the other Postulates of mathematics.
In essence what Euclid had done is to build an abstract mathematical world, a simplification. Mandelbrot, Riemann and Einstein noticed that ‘in detail’ there was much more information to it, that when points grew they were made of self-similar parts to the point and points could hold many parallels inside.
So I redefined with those insights the 4 first postulates of Euclidean mathematics and complete the 5 non-euclidean postulates and what I found is that suddenly when we observed reality with the 5 non-euclidean postulates, planes became organic networks, points acquire energy and information, lines became waves, and equality defined the most fascinating properties of reality: the evolution of self-similar species into organic systems and bosons, systems that evolved together into bigger, fractal scales of reality. Let us then go part by part of this mathematical design which merely describes with mathematical languages what we have explained with organic terms: mathematical systems evolve into complex organisms.
Indeed, first and paramount, mathematics is a language of numbers, but numbers are sets of equal particles. So by definition if a number exist, there is a group of cells/points of self-similar nature, as it happens in all organisms. So mathematics by definition exist to describe herds and organic systems of self-similar form.
Next, as Plato put it, ‘numbers are forms’, which means that Numbers are sets of self-similar cells/points which gather creating certain forms of in/form/ation, and each number therefore has a certain set of geometrical properties that define its functions. This is obvious to a chemist or a biologist but it has not been to a physicist till recently.
All this said now we can define the 5 postulates of non-euclidean geometry in a simplified manner:
– A point has parts (1, 5).
- 2 points that exchange energy and information between them form a wave (2).
- Planes are topological networks of points with parts, which become points of a higher scale of spacetime (4)
- 2 points are equal when their in/form/ation is equal (3).
And so what we call the great design has a far more detailed explanation departing from those postulates, which we have provided in other webs and books, but essentially is this. In any plane or relative scale of existence, there should be self-similar points that gather in ‘numbers’, by sharing/exchanging waves of energy and information between them, till creating complex organic networks, that become topological organisms; and then those topological organisms keep evolving as new points with parts of a future more complex, bigger network. Yet the logic behind those networks, which determines the kind of points that gather together and those who do not evolve together is defined by the relative equality between points, such as only forms that are equal in its parts evolve together into complex organisms. So all your cells have the same DNA information, and all herds are made of the same type of particle.
Of course, this is the minimal, most simple expression of the meaning of mathematics in the great design. We can, and we have in complexity translated all the mathematical equations of Euclidean mathematics to this advanced, organic Non-Euclidean mathematical design and go beyond.
It matters not so much to the reader to fully grasp those postulates but to ‘consider’ the difference between a mathematical world made with ‘points without breath’ (Euclidean points) that create a ‘continuous map’, where those ‘points form abstract lines without width’, which are again straight lines without movement, that form continuous planes without height, and the nature of a point with parts (1st postulate of Non-Euclidean geometry) that exchanges waves of energy and information with other points (second postulate), and forms therefore networks of points (non-Euclidean planes, 4th postulate), and forms those networks with multiple other points with whom it shares waves of energy and information (5th postulate); while the logic of that communication is explained in detail by the 3rd postulate: forms that are equal communicate and form organisms; those who are not do not communicate but enter in destructive, ‘darwinian events’. We are thus now in a new type of mathematics, which basically is no longer abstract, no longer a fixed drawing in a paper, but as real as reality is. And this mathematics anticipated by Riemann in the XIX century, and by Klein is a ‘vital type of mathematics. Indeed, Riemann already said that a ‘relative space’ is one in which points are related to each other by their properties and that the more equal points are the ‘tighter’ the space they form – exactly as organisms and herds do, coming together closer when they are more equal. And Klein already noticed that all the strange properties of Non-Euclidean mathematics (curvatures, dimension, etc.) could be understood if ‘distances’ were including ‘motion’, ‘time’. So we say London is at 5 minutes from here. We are talking of distances, but we talk in terms of time. So he included ‘speed’, motion in lines, geodesics, geometries.
I do not want to sound excessively complex or pedantic like string theorists are. I would like though to give a certain depth to this amazing adventure of the mind which is the science of complexity and duality, in which I am the foremost expert today in this small dot/point called planet Earth (despite the massive ad hominem campaigns of CERN against me) Still it seems necessary to introduce some advances on physics due to this r=evolution of the languages of the mind.
Some basic advances of physics thanks to the use of Non-Euclidean geometry and the dual arrows of time, energy=motion and form=information.
The fifth postulate, the first and the concept of a fractal Universe are now one: when we come closer to a point, we perceive its parts. Then, we observe also that the minimalist point becomes a cell or a star and infinite parallels of the inferior scale cross to it. So what we have is a fractal, scalar Universe that widens as we widen our perception.
The Complementarity principle of quantum physics is self-evident: all points have two ways of being perceived, as a single point-particle or as a wave of smaller particles in the smaller scale.
Indeed, if the Universe is dual, made of systems of energy and information, then all systems have a relative head/particle of information and a relative body/field of energy, and this is the bridge that unifies biology and physics as two branches of different complexity but essentially the same dualist nature, whose design obeys the same Non-Euclidean topologies of all space-time systems of the Universe, drawn in the previous graph.
In simple terms, those morphologies are easy to grasp: information is cyclical, like a clock, a head or a particle, because it has more dimensions of form than energy, which is lineal, like a body or a field of forces.
Since indeed, ‘God is a painter of forms’ (Leonardo). And cycles and spheres have more in/form/ation than lines. So in complexity we can also explain the forms of reality and deduce its functions from them.
Indeed, already Desargues proved that all curves are part of conics which are cycles (forms) moved through a line in motion (energy) and cybernetics, a branch of Complex sciences proves that all can be modelled with 0s and
s.
Take the case of the ‘great mystery that CERN was to explain, the meaning of mass and its unification with charges… This again is now easy because now we know that information is cyclical. Hence masses and charges must store information, in the same manner than lines and planes are the natural shapes of space.
Thus, in Physics, the theme of this web, the next step is to define with the new postulates of Non-Euclidean geometry all its energy forces and information particles (masses and charges). And then to unify them, following Einstein’s Principle of equivalence between forces and accelerations as either, energetic, lineal motions (forces) or ‘cyclical vortices of space-time’ (masses and charges).
And this was the birth of the organic paradigm in physics that now become ‘spiritual’ no longer ‘material’, since if masses and charges were also two types of cyclical, formal, accelerated motions and forces 2 types of lineal, energetic accelerations, the Universe was in eternal motion:
F = m x a, where M are cyclical, polidimensional informations, forms in action that stored the information of the Universe, and a, the lineal forces that expanded in space and had less dimensions.
And so we could write a fractal generator equation with those 2 physical motions, which easily transformed into each other ad eternal in big bangs and big crunches, as we do for all other scientific systems:
E<=>M(i).
Yes Einstein’s equation turned out to be the fundamental equation of complex physics. Or putting together, the 2 equations of Modern physics about Energy:
Energy=Mass (Planck’s notation) + Energy xTime =K (Heisenberg Principle, applied to Cosmology by Einstein), we obtain Mass=k/Time= kv (frequency of information)
Mass is therefore equivalent to a frequency, the frequency or speed of rotation of a vortex of Universal information. Mass is a vortex of information, which attracts as a hurricane does the faster it speeds around.
It also explains intuitively other mystery of physics, how energy becomes mass. Since now both are two forms of motion, albeit with different quantity of ‘dimensional form’, Energy merely curves in ’2 dimensions’ (c2) to become Mass, a bidimensional vortex of form.
We brought here this simple example of the many discoveries of Complex physics, because CERN pretends to explain what mass is, when Einstein did it with his principle of equivalence between acceleration and mass, which we have refined adding our new understanding of information and fractal Non-E Geometry. Einstein could only use the 5th postulate of Non-E Geometry. We have better tools in complexity. Quantum physicists like Higgs or Hawking have none. They merely pretend to deny Einstein’s work inventing sci-fi plots, like travel in time (Hawking) or particles that collide with others and instead of repelling them, attract them (Higgs).
The list of findings could go on and on… The most fascinating is the Equation that Unifies charges and masses, as two ‘scales’ of size in the evolution of the Universe, in the same manner that we can unify cells and bodies as two scales of the evolution of living organisms. Yet since this implies a bit more of knowledge of physics we have written it in the Pdf ‘in depth’ on Einstein’s mass theory. Further on, a general vision of the organic, fractal Universe and its mathematical and logic laws can be found in the pdf with that name. Just to state that within that complex view of reality ‘string theory’, the obsession of physicists like Hawking plays a very limited role. But still it is valid within the limited ‘fractal plane’ of microcosmic forces. Let us explain why.
Time and information; energy and space are synonimous.
Because all is motion but there are only two forms of motion, cyclical motion (masses and charges) and lineal motion, the Universe in any of its scales is made of cyclical forms and lineal, energetic ones. Thus, strings which are by definition of two types, open lines and cyclical, closed loops respond merely to that duality of forms in the Universe. Reason why they are useful to describe the smallest planes of reality.
But they require a lot of ‘error’s corrections’. To start with, they don’t have substance, they are ‘motions’ in a Universe in eternal motion. Then, they are not background dependent. And this needs an enormous number of corrections in their equations. Third they are not the grand design, only useful to explain the inner workings of certain elementary forces. And fourth, they don’t have 11 dimensions, because the smaller we get into the Universe the less dimensions forms have since dimensions by definition occupy space. I worked out some of those corrections a decade ago after refounding Non-Euclidean Geometry, but I didn’t pursuit that path as it is largely irrelevant for the ‘Grand Design’ and requires a lot of computing power and I believe in the mind of man not in the mind of the machine, and certainly if the reader has followed me till here, he will realize there are many more interesting fields to explore of that ‘Grand Design’, in which we are all ultimately made of ‘fractal space’ (networks of lineal forces that form planes) and ‘fractal time’ (cycles of form, of information that carry in their frequency of rotation both the ‘clock-time speed’ of a certain physical or biological system, and its information). And both then become complementary and form a particle/force system or a head/body system. Look at the graph, even machines of information are cyclical and machines of energy (weapons) that move faster are lineal.
All this requires of course a lot of logical, philosophical understanding, of artistic sense. Already Leonardo said that God was a painter of form, I would add in 4 dimensions, not in 11….
So what you see in reality is always a game of those 2 substances of which we are all made, energy, vital space and temporal, cyclical clocks of information. That is so simple and so beautiful… that as Wheeler one said, ‘once we find it, we will recognize it and wonder how couldn’t be otherwise’. Pity that we, complexity theorists don’t have big budgets, don’t play the celebrity circus, don’t worship machines and so our present mechanist civilization largely ignore us, at their own peril…
All is indeed made of those masses and charges, cycles of information, and those lines, fields of energy, which evolve in scales of self-similar form till reaching the most complex being of information of the Universe, the mind of man. Those are the thoughts of God. We, all of us, all things, all beings, are the details.
Fractal Philosophy.
In that sense, even more beautiful that the findings on the spiritual, eternal Universe of perpetual motions is the realization that the Universe is infinite in scales, obtained precisely from that equation which shows that… every 10 relative scales of fractal spacetime, a structure repeats the same in/form/ations, the same forms. Since the nucleus of an atom is self-similar to the black hole nucleus of a galaxy. So Black holes become hadrons of the bigger cosmological scale made of infinite quarks, and protons become ‘black holes’ of the lower, quantum scales… once we translate the jargon of quantum physics to the jargon of Gravitation, as Einstein wanted, not the other way around as quantum physicists have tried unsuccesfully for 100 years.
This means that the Universe is either limited between those two final scales or if each atom is a galaxy and each galaxy an atom (as Einstein and Walker thought when modeling the Universe with Relativity, considering each galaxy as a Hydrogen atom), is infinite in size, and in each of us, there is an entire number of infinite Universes.
And this is possible because now points have inner parts that when observed in detail grow in a fully relative Universe, ‘where the smallest point must be perceived as an entire world’ (Leibniz).
Since space-time is broken, fractal, made of infinite self-similar networks and organisms. It means there are many self-similar space-times, many self-similar planets, in which humans exist. Yet none of them are equal, because in fractal theory all is self-similar but nothing is absolutely equal.
In physics it solves also the puzzles of quantum physicists. For example, it means that an electron is not a sum of probable electrons in different Universes, but a sum of self-similar fractal parts, which can be described as populations of ‘cellular electrons’, with the same probabilistic equations that quantum theory. Any mathematician knows that probabilities are used to explain probable events in time, and percentages of populations in space. In other words, in advanced fractal physics we merely switch the quantum description from time to space, hence a galaxy is a fractal of self-similar stars, which have self-similar planets, with self-similar human races.
And this realization is the beginning of Fractal Logic, which coupled with the understanding of Non-Euclidean mathematics defines the ‘Grand Design of the Universe’, which is deterministic not probabilistic, albeit written with a logic more complex than that of the physicist and the present man, certainly less ‘complicated’ than the epicycles and false theories of Mr. Hawking. A logic, organic design that all its species follow, as we have shown in other posts of this web.
But of course, space is the easiest part to understand of the new Age of mathematics and logic that we are finding. The key to everything is the logic of fractal space, which requires to break also time into infinite clocks, one for each cycle of reality that closes in itself. Which again means that as Einstein said, ‘there are infinite clocks of time’, and so infinite time speeds, and each of those vortices of mass, each of those charge vortices is a clock of time, which carries a frequency of information in the intelligent Universe. Imagine that: you exist in an eternal, intelligent, moving Universe, where all is gauging information, feeding on energy, turning into patterns of form, ticking. And further on, the smallest you are, the faster you tick, the faster the methabolism of the rat is, the faster the electron turns. And this is the key of the harmony of all planes of reality. An ant lives 7 years but it processes information 10 times faster than a man, so in subjective time it lives 70 years. An atom is billions of times faster than a galaxy, but billions of time smaller. And so the previously quoted equation of Einstein:
Energy/Motion/Space x Time/Information = Konstant… Max. E x Min. T = Min. E x Max. T
means that when we change from scale, what we loose in size we gain in speed of time, and in total we exist the same quantity. Like in the book ‘the shrinking man’, if we were becoming smaller we would merely change our perception of time that would adapt to the new plane. And so the life of an ant might be as profound and rich in meaning as the life of a human being. And that is what connects the “Mind of the Universe’ to the classic myths of Eastern religions that studied them. Indeed, the Great Zimmer tells us in his ‘Myths of the India’, how Vishnu tells Indra, king of kings not to be so arrogant: he suddenly looks at the floor and sees a group of ants and Indra asks the Vishnu child, what are you looking at? Im looking to a group of Indras walking in a queue and crashes them…
Epilogue
Enough said in this post, follow the links or go to my other webs if you want to learn more (sorry I cannot send you to my google scholar papers, now I don’t exist, since I don’t worship machines);or better still don’t read more, feel, absorb what I have told you, sink on it, on the beauty and perfection of the intelligence and eternity of it all, dissolve your mind in the mind of God, instead of forcing God to obey you, because neither Hawking nor Einstein understood that if ‘their theories were wrong God didn’t have to correct the Cosmos’ as Einstein pretended but man had to learn the higher logic of God, because the Universe is perfect as that humble true genius, Leibniz always affirmed.
Marvel, wonder and fear the Grand Design, because we humans have denied in our arrogance the Grand Design, which is the Tree of Life, and have adored instead the shitty designs of weapons and machines our Monkey Scientificus Lethaliensis have built, and we still keep denying His Mind. But our moronic designs sooner or latter will blow in our face, courtesy of CERN, Hawking and all the arrogant physicists that simplify it all into big bangs and the dark side of Shiva, Lord of death. Because black holes and strangelets will also behave as organisms, organic bombs that will feed and convert our matter into themselves.
Complex Science goes much further than this in its understanding of the meaning of God. As it represents a veritable theory of Unification of Religious thought.
It brings back the old Platonic concept that “This world is a living, being composed of a mind and a body.” And it brings back a rational explanation to the mystique concepts of Christianity (Orestes, Tertulianus, Saint Agustine), Islam (Sufies, Ibn Khaldun) and Buddhism (tipitaka)
It shows ultimately that the ‘language of religion’ is a human jargon to express the natural arrow of Eusocial Evolution that all species follow; and the goal of mankind should be to create a super-organism of History ruled by the laws of eusocial love (to share energy and information among all human cells).
It also imposes to each of us for a question of ‘dignity’ and ‘respect’ for the Universe, a humility respect to the Grand Design, a desire for anonymity that I have always followed so different from the circus of scientific celebrities that have pumped minions of thought into ‘monsters of arrogance’, able to risk our lives for a prize. It is not the blame of scientists so much as the result of a system of mass-media that has completely deformed the ‘face value’ of people and convert freaks like Lady Gaga into Beethovens to sell more cds and children of thought like Hawking accustomed to hear that he is the most intelligent man on planet Earth and the new Einstein, in new Dr. Strangeloves that are so sure of their doodles that don’t see any risk in defying the Master, Mr. Einstein with his experiments on black holes.
Furthe ron, we live in a dark age for ethics, a world close to its extinction precisely because science has forgotten the role of Ethics in the survival of ‘species’, which are always more important than individuals. And so it has created hand in hand with mass-media, a new world of selfish, ego-centric individuals who feel ‘entitled’ to defy the Top Predator speciesof the Universe.
Today science and religion are corrupted, and so the superorganism of history is dying; the human cells are back into an ‘homo bacteria’ state of mind, which Hawking symbolizes with his cuckoo pretensions of ‘creating’ the laws of the Universe with computers and mathematics, instead of respectfully search for answers to the experimented reality.
And religion is indeed the engine of History, and so the experimental method of science must explain why religions exist, and what is the role within the evolution of man, instead of insulting the intelligence, the feelings and the billions of people who believe in them, with the type of constant, retarded comments we here from people like Hawking and Dawnkins. Of course, Mr. Hawking et al do not belong to any superorganism of history but to the limited biological organism called man. They have never felt the assabiyah the prayer feels turning around the Kaaba, in the mystique creation of the superorganism of Allah; or the communion of Saints people feel listening to the Pope or in a Mass gathering. Their souls have been never dissolved into the Nirvana of the Universal mind.
Those moments in which the ego transcends and emerges into the subconscious collective of God are all gone. Today we are mediated by machines, in this age of devolution of the human mind and evolution of the computer mind, Human Gods are dying and so as our superorganisms of history die, we, individual cells suffer a ‘rigor mortis’ of ego-happiness. When the nervous system dies, the cells are no longer suffering pain and remorse, but become fat, absorbing without restrain the liquids of the body. They all have a last banquet, before they realize without the ethical, sharing behavior imposed by the nervous system they will soon be prey of a stronger organism, the insect, which they could have easily defeated as a single being.
Mankind now in its last stages of decadence, when, as in the 3rd age of any superorganism, an excess of information has corrupted the ‘right, ethical’ information that guided mankind in the past, is a corpse in rigor mortis. And eviL, the genetic ‘antiparticle’ of Live rules supreme. Ethics no longer matter. Never mind Mr. Hawking can destroy the world in collaboration with CERN. This is no important prize if maybe I can get my Saint Nobel of the Dynamite.
We live in a society of selfish children, which fits this 3rd age of history. As old people return to the mind of children… with an evil twist. And then one day they stumble upon a real perfect organism and die.
This is what man is about to do stumbling on the ‘informative, DNA of the galaxy’, the black hole.
Let us explain ourselves.
If the God of Man, the ethic books of revelation that put together humans into functioning societies is dying, the God of the Galaxy, the informative network of dark matter and gravitational bodies (black holes and strangelets, being the main MACHO candidates), is NOT.
In Complex astrophysics the galaxy can be modelled as a superorganism with 2 fundamental networks. One of dark matter and gravitation, the informative network and one of electromagnetism and reproductive stars, the mitochondria that evolves and reproduces dark matter, as they die leaving behind strange stars and black holes.
We have been able to explain most phenomena unexplained by simple astrophysics (which uses only maths and the energy arrow to explain the Universe), thanks to those models. And the proofs of the existence of such superorganisms keep coming. The ‘galacell’ indeed resembles more and more the self-similar fractal scale of an organic cell, where the DNA of gravitational information which organizes all the stars and elements of the cell are the black holes, likely to be as Einstein thought: frozen stars made of the heaviest particles of the Universe, top quarks – NOT mathematical musings, as Wheeler and Hawking wanted.
But an organic interpretation of the Universe is too complex and not ‘evident’, cannot be seen, because we cannot see dark matter, dark energy, gravitation. So we are observing only 4% of the organization of the galaxy. And we have to fill up the gaps using the logic of superorganisms. And yet the proofs keep coming. First we found that indeed, 96% of those structures are invisible. Then we found that there is a life/death cycle, the quasar cycle, which renews galaxies, as those explosions provoke the creation of new ones. Now we know that inside the ‘nuclei’ of those galacells, there is not a single abstract black hole but active swarms. Finally we have found that black holes have erratic behavior and many ‘migrate’ as RNA strains do, once they are born from a mithocondria, to the center of the Galaxy.
My take is that in the same way in our ecosystem there are plants that feed but do not see light and animals that react to light as information, in the dual universe there are stars who ‘feed’ on the gravitational space-time of the galaxy, bending it as Einstein explains but do not ‘see’ the gravitational space-time. And then there are black holes who act-react to gravitation. In the cell obviously RNA molecules, using the OH-, O+ repulsive/impulsive legs of their aminoacids swim and seem to perceive the electromagnetic and wan der Waals force of the system to somehow organize the cell. Obviously there should not be consciousness on those structures but aperception, a word coined by Leibniz, the great philosopher of science and founding father of modern duality (with his philosophy of science and his discovery of the binary language today used by computers to model the Universe with 2 symbols), whose astounding insights only now we start to confirm as the beginning of a new dawn in science. Unfortunately the predecessor of Mr. Hawking, Mr. Newton, a pumped up mediocre unethical scientist, who stole from Leibniz the science of Calculus and then mounted a smearing campaign against him, succeeded in hiding Mr. Leibniz findings, who died in poverty and ignored. Today CERN has mounted a smearing campaign against the heirs of Leibniz like Mr. Rossler or this writer. While Mr. Hawking does not answer any letter from CERN critics, which can jeopardize his Newton-like ambitions to be the only ‘ego-cell’ of this planet to know ‘the mind of God’. The harder they fall…
Returning to Leibniz’s philosophy of science, he distinguished between consciousness and aperception. Consciousness implies to be aware of one’s self-thinking. Yet to act-react in the Universe only aperception is required. Aperception means in that sense that in a mechanical, almost vegetative manner systems emerge and organize themselves through actions-reactions motivated by the forces of their environment. In the case of a galaxy, it is increasingly obvious as Lee Smolin explains and I have insisted for decades in my spanish books on complexity that the ‘Grand Design’ favors black holes, its creation and control of the Galaxy.
Now we are going to do the superorganism of the Universe, its top predator, its Tyrannosaurs Rex, because children of thought like Hawking or the kids working at CERN are so arrogant and ignorant of the laws of the organic Universe, so indifferent to both, the Human, Ethic Gods that oblige us to care more for the superorganism of history than for ourselves, and to the top predator ‘DNA-network’ of gravitational dark matter that rules the galaxy… that they don’t see what will happen.
‘Gifted those who without seeing believe, because to them belongs the kingdom of heavens’.
Modern science was created by the discovery of machines that see instead of human eyes. We thus need ‘pics’ of a visual mapping to believe. Super-organisms however have a fundamental property: the information network is always faster, thinner, more invisible than the energetic network we see. Today we only know and understand in monist physics, the energetic networks. The informative network of gravitation in the superorganism of the galaxy or the verbal networks of social evolution in the superorganisms of history are not ‘visible’. So we do not believe in them. We do not see either the ‘fractal scales of the Universe ‘ and only slowly have come to realize that there is besides this perceived scale, smaller scales from cells to atoms we didn’t know there were there.
But we will never have the point of view needed to see the upper scales. We hinted at it when from the moon we saw the entire blue planet that now CERN will try to blow up, as a single dot of a much bigger cosmos. Gaia, the body of Mankind, the collective mind of History is about to die, because we have NOT obeyed the commandments of love and selfleshness, because we have not worshipped the tree of life but the tree of technology. And that is just.
I do regret though that since I have confronted for ethic reasons the Popes of obsolete mechanist science, Hawking and CERN, like Galileo did after confronting the Vatican Scientists, I will now remain under ‘house arrest’, after the massive ad hominem campaign I have been submitted to, and I will no longer be able to share all those discovers of what I used to call the ’3rd age of science’, that of complex Non-AE logic thought. It is obvious I will never work again as a scientist, nor will be invited to congresses. I am now with Rossler ‘non-persons’, which can no longer publish even in the blogs of the net. So my wisdom will be lost and maybe my life in CERN’s experiments. In any case this has always been the destiny of pioneers; those in which I recognize a precedent to this work, from Plato and Aristotle to Leonardo and Leibniz, from Riemann to Einstein. But even if man doesn’t make it, or doesn’t want to evolve his mind, the Universe will remain there in all its beauty. And so if we die it will be because we didn’t deserve to be part of that beauty.
Since as Leibniz put it, the Universe must be perfect (or else its Mind wouldn’t be God, a perfect, eternal being by definition).
And part of that perfection is the fact that there are less combinations of form than fractal parallel world that host them. So we shall be repeated, the game of Mankind will be essayed again. And there will be many other fractal, self-similar planets, in which the Human being will exist because it will be a better being. Are we transcendental beings, able to migrate our souls into those self-similar planets? I won’t enter into arguments on fractal metaphysics, which these days I only have and not so often in our present state of depression, with my friend Rossler…. In any case, in Fractal Theory, there are not like in the bizarre Everett interpretation of quantum theory that Hawking backs, multiple Universes, but the ‘sum over histories’ of all possible Human Histories happen in the same Universe, as space-time is fractal.So at least one planet has the ideal, platonic canon, the perfect shadow of the cave, the perfect human being, as this planet had some of them, in prophets like Jesus or Buddha, in artists like Michelangelo, in beautiful minds like that of Leibniz.
And I am sure in one of them, God will have spare us from knowing His mind through the self-similar demigod, Mr. Hawking and so CERN will not have a excuse to blow us all. And we shall all be reunited in that planet, in which the laws of eusocial love will create a superorganism of history, which will be eternal. I only wish that my platonic self-similar human being will be born again in one of those planets where the true gods of mankind are still worshiped, because here our superorganism will end soon, as we have worshipped only the dark side of God, Shiva, Yang, Shiva&Kali, the destroyer of worlds and his practitioners, the physicists…
‘I am become Kali, the destroyer of worlds’ Oppenheimer, father of the A-Bomb, of the wrong black hole theory (Singularity), the man who inaugurated CERN.
.jpg)
Tiada ulasan:
Catat Ulasan